After Fleeing Poland, an Antiracism Activist Finds Refuge in Norway

The antiracism activist fled on New Year’s Eve in 2018 along with his spouse and toddler, looking for refuge in Norway, which has lengthy welcomed political refugees from determined corners of the world.

But the activist, Rafal Gawel, wasn’t escaping a war-torn nation. He was fleeing Poland, a member of the democratic and peaceable European Union. Although his preliminary request for asylum in Norway was rejected, final month an appeals board there granted his request.

It was a dramatic chain of occasions that underscored considerations elsewhere in Europe that Poland’s democracy — as soon as considered an important success story of the post-Soviet period — has regressed underneath the right-wing coalition that has dominated the nation for the previous 5 years.

While Mr. Gawel’s case is sophisticated, the asylum choice mirrored worries about political affect in the Polish judicial system. Norway’s immigration service stated it had granted him asylum on the grounds that he confronted political persecution in Poland, a uncommon occasion of a rustic in Europe providing such safety to a citizen of the European Union. Norway just isn’t a member of the bloc, however maintains shut relations with it.

A controversial and well-known artist and human rights activist in Poland, Mr. Gawel, 47, is a sophisticated determine on the heart of an worldwide tussle over democratic rights. He has had authorized troubles in Poland, fleeing the nation simply earlier than being sentenced to jail for 2 years for fraud and misappropriation of funds.

He says, with out offering proof, that the fees in opposition to him have been an effort by Poland’s authorities to rein him in and that the trial was rigged.

The Polish authorities has famous that the fraud prices have been introduced in opposition to him underneath a earlier, extra centrist administration in 2013. And a nonprofit group in Poland funded by the financier George Soros has accused Mr. Gawel of mismanaging funds that it allotted to his group, the Center for Monitoring Racist and Xenophobic Behavior. Those prices have been used in the courtroom case in opposition to him.

Mr. Gawel stated that Poland’s authorities had focused him over his work documenting a rising variety of hate crimes in the nation, and that it had ordered far-right militants to bodily hurt him. “The decision to grant me asylum saved my life,” he stated in an interview.

The Norwegian appeals board that reviewed and accepted Mr. Gawel’s asylum utility concluded that the aim of the courtroom case was to curtail his actions, and that he is likely to be in hazard if he returned to Poland.

It discovered that Mr. Gawel risked “political persecution from government officials, under the cover and appearance of a criminal case where the purpose has been to limit his freedom of speech and activity by imprisoning him, and possibly also discrediting him.” The conclusion, which was not made public by Norway, was learn out to The New York Times by Lukasz Niedzielski, Mr. Gawel’s lawyer.

Gunnar Ekelove-Slydal, the performing secretary normal on the Oslo-based Norwegian Helsinki Committee, a human rights group, stated Norway’s choice was a transparent signal of mounting considerations in Europe over democratic backsliding in Poland.

“The trust toward the Polish judiciary among European states is falling apart,” he stated.

But Poland’s deputy minister of overseas affairs, Pawel Jablonski, stated in an interview that Mr. Gawel’s conviction was primarily based on felony prices. “He was convicted by two courts,” the minister stated. “We suspect that they might have been manipulated by his words,” he added, referring to Norway’s immigration companies.

Poland has in current years been at loggerheads with its companions in Europe over considerations that its democracy is being undermined by the right-wing coalition led by the Law and Justice Party that took energy in 2015. The authorities has actively labored to restrict freedom of speech and L.G.B.T.Q. rights — and has additionally weakened judicial independence, assuming larger controls over the prosecutor’s workplace and judges.

“The ruling Law and Justice government has used the past five years to put the judiciary under its control, raising serious concerns about the independence of courts, judges and prosecutors,” stated Lydia Gall, a senior researcher on Eastern Europe at Human Rights Watch.

The European Union has imposed modest sanctions on Poland, and a number of other of the bloc’s members have additionally taken particular person actions in response. This 12 months, Germany and the Netherlands refused to extradite Polish residents who have been underneath European arrest warrants to Poland over fears that they might not obtain honest trials.

Human rights consultants stated that Mr. Gawel’s case was important given how not often E.U. residents are granted asylum in different European nations. Of the tens of 1000’s of individuals to be granted asylum by Norway in the previous decade, solely 18 have been E.U. residents, in keeping with the nation’s immigration statistics. One Pole was given asylum final 12 months, in keeping with official statistics, however the human rights consultants stated they weren’t conscious of that case. Norway often doesn’t present particulars about particular asylum circumstances.

Jakub Godzimirski, an knowledgeable on Polish-Norwegian relations on the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, stated that some Poles utilized for asylum after the top of Communist rule in Poland in the early Nineties, however that the majority have been refused.

“The threshold to get asylum from a European Union country in Norway is quite high,” he stated.

In the interview, Mr. Gawel stated he had left Poland by automotive though his passport had been confiscated, and that the consular workers of a European nation that he declined to establish had helped him and his household attain Norway.

Mr. Gawel stated that he and his spouse, Karolina Krupa, received married simply days earlier than fleeing. “We picked up the marriage certificate in the morning, just before leaving, and then got our car checked by wiretap and GPS experts,” he stated. “We felt like refugees, and we were refugees.”

Norway initially rejected his asylum request, however he appealed the choice and was granted refugee standing on Sept. 30.

In the interview, Mr. Gawel denied any wrongdoing and stated he had introduced the Norwegian immigration authorities with paperwork proving his innocence.

“I was targeted because my organization exposed ties between local authorities, government figures and far-right groups,” he stated, including that his group had lodged over 400 complaints about hate crimes dedicated in Poland this 12 months.

Mr. Gawel had additionally been at odds with a nonprofit group working in Poland. Ewa Kulik-Bielinska, the pinnacle of the Stefan Batory Foundation, an unbiased basis established by Mr. Soros, stated Mr. Gawel had misused the equal of $20,000 of subsidies that it awarded him.

Mr. Gawel attributed the incident to a distinction with the muse over the proper procedures for dealing with cash.

The decide who sentenced him in 2019 stated in her ruling that Mr. Gawel had used loans and donations for his personal goals. “Disposing of public money requires transparency and honesty,” stated the decide, Alina Kaminska, in keeping with Polish information stories.

Mr. Gawel declined to indicate the paperwork granting him asylum when requested by The Times. The Norwegian Immigration Appeals Board confirmed that he had been granted asylum, however declined to touch upon the specifics.

Mr. Niedzielski, his lawyer, stated he hoped Norway’s choice can be “a game changer” in how European nations take care of Poland, though consultants stated it was unlikely to push the Polish authorities to vary course.

But, stated Mr. Ekelove-Slydal, from the Norwegian Helsinki Committee, “if such decisions are followed by concrete consequences, on economic cooperation or investments, then it could trigger new reflections on the courts in Poland.”

“Trust in Poland’s judiciary has been undermined,” he stated, “which means that a fundamental pillar of European cooperation is threatened.”

Elian Peltier reported from London, Monika Pronczuk from Brussels, and Henrik Pryser Libell from Oslo, Norway. Anatol Magdziarz contributed reporting from Warsaw.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: