HC pulls up UGC for filing an evasive counter affidavit in arrear exams case


The Madras High Court on Thursday got here down closely on the University Grants Commission (UGC) for filing an evasive counter affidavit to a case filed in opposition to State Government’s choice to cancel arrear examinations of all arts, science, engineering and Master of Computer Application college students besides for these pursuing ultimate 12 months throughout the present tutorial 12 months.

Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and R. Hemalatha questioned how an professional physique reminiscent of UGC may file a counter affidavit with out commenting upon the principle crux of the case. The senior decide in the Bench mentioned the fee ought to have both not understood the case in any respect or deliberately chosen to keep away from commenting upon the difficulty in query.

In the counter affidavit, UGC Under Secretary Umakant Baluni had not supplied any touch upon the correctness or in any other case of the State Government’s choice to cancel the arrear examinations. Instead, he had solely acknowledged about tips issued by the UGC instructing all universities to essentially conduct examinations for ultimate 12 months/terminal semester college students.

However, advocate V. Sudha, representing UGC, tendered honest apology for the error and undertook to file an extra affidavit by November 20. She additionally informed the court docket that UGC was not in favour of cancellation of the arrear examinations by the State authorities and it desires universities to conduct exams by following the usual working procedures laid down by the Centre.

On her half, advocate AL. Ganthimathi, representing All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), additionally informed the court docket that the council too was not in favour of cancellation of the examinations. After listening to them, Justice Sathyanarayanan questioned why the arrear examinations cannot be carried out, a minimum of by way of on-line mode.

Special Government Pleader (Education) E. Manoharan sought time to file an in depth counter affidavit explaining the rationale behind the State authorities’s choice to cancel the examinations and therefore the judges adjourned the case for additional listening to to November 20.

They instructed the SGP and counsel for UGC to serve their counter affidavits in advance on E. Vijay Anand, counsel for former Anna University Vice Chancellor E. Balagurusamy, who had filed a public curiosity litigation petition in opposition to the cancellation of arrear examinations, and in addition on different counsel representing the intervenors.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: